🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to reinitiate nuclear discussions with the United States provided that it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and disclosed recent overtures had come from mediators to resume talks with the American leadership. He said Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Navigating a Challenging Course

The foreign minister is navigating a difficult route since Iran does not want be perceived to be operating from a stance of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more resilient in military terms and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium within its borders that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Discussions Unexpectedly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump claiming the locations had been destroyed. Following this, European countries employed their right to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iranian officials said they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with US participation could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the discussions that American atomic experts could work inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Officials asserted on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with the US representative the American negotiator only for the deal to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Situation

Iran's diplomats stated the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be resurrected in certain ways if discussions restart.

Trump in recent days stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Iranian officials say they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from Washington either directly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran states dialogue is not part of a show.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his remarks to the gathering, designed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the concept of worldwide standards, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement showed the conflict could not be resolved by military means. He stated the assaults started with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were carried out with full US knowledge and coordination, making confidence hard to restore.

Dialogue Remains the Primary Answer

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was America and the western countries that had always attempted to dictate their desires during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be active and continues the ultimate answer to settle disagreements, but its criteria, regulations and tenets must be respected."

"In case they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and respect, they will get a reply in the equivalent language."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iranian officials as the struggle of repair and reconstruction, the foreign minister claimed he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We learned multiple understandings from this war; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He continued: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to eliminate, continues to exist. The facilities and equipment, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but were unable to shatter. The Iranian people have become stronger, more cohesive, and more supportive of the government and the nation in the aftermath of this invasion."